Wanted to let you all in on a knock down, drag out fight with a PR flack (no pun intended) from University Hospital. Listen to what happened and you be the judge.
A 19 year old patient claimed she was raped in a hospital elevator. Don Crause, director of marketing, inferred to me by phone that the incident might not be a rape after all. His exact words were that police will need to “finish investigating to see if there was an incident.” That of course, casts doubt on the victim, which is the biggest challenge rape victims have: convincing people they didn’t “ask for it.” (By the way the suspect, Archie Sanders, was arrested and charged with Rape. He is being held on $100,000 bond.)
Anyway, before I went to air with the story I felt like the victim had a right to speak for herself, so I called her…..in her hospital room. Didn’t do anything sneaky. Just got her name from court records, dialed the hospitals main number and asked for her room. She picked up the phone and started telling me what happened almost immediately….knowing full well who I was, what I was doing and that I was recording the conversation. She WANTED people to know that she was NOT A LIAR….that she was attacked and raped in that elevator no matter what the hospital believed.
Don (the PR flack) wasn’t happy I spoke with the victim. First he telephoned one of my supervisors and called me a “low-life” for calling a rape victim in the hospital. When I spoke to Don directly, he told me I was one of a handful of reporters with a “reputation” for having shady motives.
My question to Don is this: why does giving an alleged rape victim a chance to speak up for herself make me a “low-life?” I feel like victims of sex crimes should be given every opportunity to tell their stories….IF THEY CHOOSE TO. AND SHE DID! So I don’t think giving her a voice was so sleazy…do you?
What I want to know is: why Don was so upset I spoke with her in the first place?